Fund managers bought the IPO. Should you?
đ âIf #MutualFunds and #NPS Fund Managers are investing in an #IPO, why shouldnât I?â
Recently, a friend asked me this exact question.
He wanted to invest in an IPO, but after reviewing the financials, I told him not to.
His comeback was sharp: âIf the MF you invest in is applying⌠even NPS schemes are applying⌠then why shouldnât I?â
On paper, it sounds logical.
After all, MF and NPS fund managers are far more experienced than most of us. If theyâre subscribing, it must be good, right?
Well⌠the devil lies in the details.
đ§ The part most people never check - What percentage of the IPO allocation is actually part of the fundâs total AUM?
Most of the time: less than 1%.
Many funds participate just for visibility, not because itâs a high-conviction investment.
And we donât know the real intent: Are they looking for quick listing gains? Or a long-term position? Is it purely an optics move?
The answers are never disclosed upfront.
âBut at least, the NPS fund managers are supposed to keep my money safe!â This was his next point.
I explained that NPS fund managers, too, are allowed to take calculated #risks, within PFRDA guidelines.
Under current rules:
- They can invest in the top 200 companies by market cap.
- They can also invest in IPOs whose market cap is higher than the 200th company.
And letâs be clear: NPS is not a guaranteed return product. Returns can fluctuate as per the Risks taken by the Fund manager!
đ¤ˇAll this is ok, âSo should I invest or not?â
In todayâs IPO frenzy, most IPOs are oversubscribed, and retail investors hardly get even one lot. Most IPO lots are around âš15,000, which for many people is less than 1% of their portfolio.
So my answer was simple:
- If you want to try your luck, go ahead.
- Gains or losses on such a small amount wonât change your net worth.
- Donât overthink it, but donât mistake MF/NPS participation as a stamp of approval either.
Do you think MF/NPS participation in IPOs influences retail investors?